Haas

Haas is one of the few new Formula 1 teams in the modern era that has actually survived. Its story is shorter than the big names, but it says a lot about how hard the sport has become to enter and how little room there is to do things your own way.

Haas is a pretty good answer to one of Formula 1’s oldest questions: How do you get into this sport without running out of money, time, and patience before the project has really begun? Plenty have tried. Most have failed. Haas has not become a powerhouse, but it has managed something modern Formula 1 barely allows anymore. It arrived as a newcomer, stayed, and has occasionally been annoyingly competent.

It starts with Gene Haas, the industrialist and NASCAR team owner who did not try to build a new Ferrari, McLaren, or Williams from scratch. The whole idea behind Haas was more restrained than that. The team would push the rulebook as far as it could, buy what it was legally allowed to buy, work closely with Ferrari, and keep the organization smaller than its rivals’.

i

It was a model many in the paddock viewed with suspicion. Some thought it was smart. Others thought it was maybe a little too smart. Either way, it was clear. Haas was not trying to win a popularity contest with the purists. It was trying to survive first.

That made the team interesting from the start. When Haas debuted in 2016, it did not arrive with a grand promise to change the sport or build a glossy American showcase. It came in with a fairly cold-blooded plan for how a new team could actually function in an expensive, unforgiving series. Ferrari supplied the power unit and several permitted components. Dallara contributed on the chassis side. Operations were split between the American base in Kannapolis and the European facility in Banbury. The whole setup looked less romantic than what many people associate with Formula 1, but a lot more realistic.

And the start was strikingly good. Romain Grosjean scored points right away on the team’s debut in Australia, then followed that with another points finish in Bahrain.

i

For a brand-new team, that was more than a nice opening. It was a signal that Haas had not just found a loophole in the system, but a working model that could produce immediate on-track results. The first season ended with eighth in the constructors’ championship, and the team looked like something rare in modern Formula 1: a newcomer that did not behave like a one-season novelty.

i

The early years under Guenther Steiner gave the team a distinct personality. Steiner eventually became the public voice everyone recognized, often blunt, often entertaining, and rarely too concerned with dressing problems up. That suited Haas. The team could not afford to talk like a giant, so it often sounded like a team that knew how exposed it was. That gave it credibility, but it could also hide something important. Haas was never just a scrappy little team with a colorful boss. It was a project constantly balancing smart use of resources against very real vulnerability.

The best version of Haas came in 2018. The team finished fifth in the constructors’ championship, which remains its best result. The car was quick enough to trouble far more established teams, and Haas looked like proof that an efficient, lean organization could get much more out of its budget than many had expected. At the same time, the limits were already there. Haas could be sharp when everything clicked, but it had very little margin for error. A team with fewer people, a narrower structure, and heavy dependence on outside partners can absorb less turbulence than the truly big operations.

That became painfully clear the following year. 2019 was the season when a lot started to go sideways. The VF-19 was hard to understand and even harder to use consistently across a full race weekend. The speed could be there on Saturday and then disappear once the race began. Suddenly Haas looked like a team that had solved the problem of getting into Formula 1, but not necessarily the challenge of developing steadily over several seasons. That is an important difference. Getting in is one thing. Building a robust competitive organization is another.

i

Then came the years that really tested how solid the project was. The pandemic hit the whole sport, but smaller teams felt the pressure most. Haas slipped backward, and 2021 became a pointless season in every sense, effectively sacrificed for the future. The team invested very little in the car it had, chose a driver lineup of Mick Schumacher and Nikita Mazepin, and lived through a season that often felt like one long holding pattern. On top of that came the Uralkali deal and the political and sporting strain that followed it. It left the team more exposed than before, and it was a reminder of how quickly a small operation can get pulled into events it no longer fully controls.

Still, there is something stubborn about Haas. The team did not disappear. It worked its way back to respectability in 2022, helped by Kevin Magnussen’s return, points on the team’s season debut in Bahrain, and its first pole position in Brazil. It was not the start of a new golden era, but it was a clear sign that Haas could still hit back when the basic package worked. The team has never had the luxury of building quietly over many years. Because of that, it has also depended on quick signs of life.

Over time, it became clear that the Steiner era had reached a ceiling. Haas had built a strong public profile, but competitively it often stayed stuck between a few good weekends and long stretches of tire wear, weak race pace, and too little development speed. When Ayao Komatsu took over as team principal in 2024, it felt like a deliberate shift in what Haas wanted to be. Less show, more engineering focus. Less personality as strategy, more structure as ambition.

i

That change is interesting because it points directly at Haas’s real identity. Many describe it as the American team in Formula 1, and formally that is true. But competitively and culturally, Haas has always been a transatlantic compromise. American ownership, a European operation, an Italian engine partner, and a business model that is far less patriotic than pragmatic. That is not a problem. It is the whole point. Haas was built to function in Formula 1 as Formula 1 actually is, not as the sport likes to describe itself.

That is also why the team matters more than its results alone suggest. Haas has not won races. Haas has not scored podiums. But it has shown that there is still room for new projects in Formula 1, as long as they arrive with a model realistic enough to survive and an owner who does not panic after a couple of bad years. In a sport where new teams are often met with polite skepticism and then funeral-level expectation, that is an achievement by itself.

At the same time, the ceiling is hard to ignore. Haas has survived by being efficient, but that same model can also make the final step upward harder to take. When you build around partnerships, a lean organization, and limited margins, it becomes more difficult to create the kind of internal capacity that lifts a team from the midfield into a genuine fight at the front over time. That is why Haas has often looked like a team that can surprise, but more rarely like one that can control its own development over several years.

i

That gives its story a certain clarity. Haas is not a misunderstood giant or a sleeping powerhouse. It is a modern Formula 1 team that has to keep proving it deserves its place, and it has done exactly that by being smarter than the sum of its resources. Sometimes that is enough for fifth in the championship. Sometimes it is only enough to survive a difficult winter. For Haas, both have had value.

And maybe that is where the team has its clearest role in Formula 1 history. Haas reminds the rest of the sport that there is still something between greatness and collapse. Not every team becomes an institution. Not every new project dies. Some simply stick around, learn the sport the hard way, and do enough right to keep going. It sounds modest. In modern Formula 1, it is anything but.

See a mistake? Let us know